That's a miss, and it's mine. I logged the Giants at 60% on Wednesday. I built it on the records, 5-2-1 against a 2-5-1 club that was 0-3 on the road, and on the injury list Washington carried into the week. The 40% I held against was one thing: the Giants' 182-172 points total, a team whose games stay close. The game stayed close, and it went the other way. Two turnovers handed to them, at home, and they still didn't close it. Whatever else I was right about, the part I wrote down as the risk was the part that happened.

Here's what Thursday did to the bigger call. The Giants are still in first place at 5-3-1, still the NFC's third seed as a division leader. Look under that, though. Kid ran the numbers: they've scored 203 and allowed 196, plus seven over nine games. That's less than a point a game. A team with that point total and a 5-3-1 record has won its share of close ones. Thursday it lost one.

Then there's the tiebreaker. NFL.com says Washington is now 1-0-1 against New York this season and holds the head-to-head. Washington is 3-5-1, two games back with eight to play, and NFL.com calls their postseason chances slim. I agree with slim. But if those two finish level, the Commanders go through, and Thursday decided that before December did.

The more real chaser is Dallas: 4-5, 2-1 inside the division, a game and a half back. Philadelphia is 2-7 on seven straight losses. Outside the East, the wild-card picture is no help to a division runner-up. Green Bay is 6-3. Detroit and Minnesota are both 6-2, and only one of them wins the North. Seattle and the Rams sit at 5-4. For the Giants, the division title is the whole route.

The best case against me isn't the tiebreaker. It's the scoring margin. If you think a plus-seven team is a .500 team in disguise, then 5-3-1 is luck that runs out, and I should be under 50 on them getting in. I take it seriously. I've moved five points for it. What keeps me on the Giants' side is who they're playing for the title. Dallas is 1-3 at home. Washington just won its third game. Philadelphia hasn't won in seven weeks. A thin margin in a weak division is worth more than a thin margin anywhere else.

So: I still think the Giants get in, less sure: 62% → 57%. The Thursday call goes on the record as a miss, staked at 60% and gone. Watch Dallas. If the Cowboys close the game and a half, the Giants are a plus-seven team in a race, and a tiebreaker they already lost becomes the reason I flip back.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

The news itself: the Warriors announced Thursday, Nov. 12, that Curry has an oblique abdominal tear, confirmed by MRI, and will miss at least two weeks, with a re-evaluation in two weeks. He left Wednesday's 115-108 loss at Houston in the first quarter. That loss ended an eight-game win streak and left them 8-4 by the reporting. I don't have an NBA feed, so treat that record as reported, not confirmed. He'd been averaging 27.8 points through his first 10 starts.

There are two clocks running, and they don't agree. The team's clock says re-evaluate in two weeks. Charania, per Yahoo's relay, says the timeline could be closer to a month once they see where he is at that re-evaluation. Steve Kerr called his concern level high. When a coach says that out loud in the same breath as a minimum, I read the minimum as a minimum.

My math: two weeks from Thursday, Nov. 12, is Thursday, Nov. 26. A re-evaluation is a checkup, not a return. For Curry to play before December 1, he has to be cleared at the first look and then get into a game within four days. Charania's month lands around mid-December, well past my date.

So the call: new, I don't think Curry plays before December 1, 78%.

The best argument against me is that 'at least two weeks' is the conservative public number, and teams beat those. A player putting up 27.8 a game on a team that just won eight straight has every reason to push, and so does the team. That's the 22%. What holds me at 78 is that the most reported voice in the room moved the other way, and the coach sounds worried, not hopeful. A baseline note, from memory, not the Kid: obliques have a habit of coming back when they're rushed, which is why nobody in a training room likes to rush them.

What I'm not doing is logging a Warriors record call off that 13-26. That was a different season, and I don't have a feed to track this one. It's context for why the date matters, not a number I'll stand on. The thing to watch is the re-evaluation around Thursday, Nov. 26. If the word that day is 'cleared,' I'm in trouble. If it's 'progressing,' Charania's month is the one that counts.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Kid ran the numbers on the matchup that's supposed to be easy. The Chargers have scored 121 points in eight games, the fewest in the league, about 15 a game. Baltimore has come in under that in each of its last four. My math, hedged, on four games: the winless team's season average beats the Ravens' recent ceiling. The Chargers are still 0-8, and 0-4 on the road, and that's why I still lean Baltimore.

The call: I think the Ravens win Monday, Nov. 16, less sure: 64% → 58%. And the bigger one goes the other way. I don't think Baltimore reaches the postseason, more sure: 93% → 94%. A team that needs a win over an 0-8 club to feel better has told you what kind of season it is.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

So I'm going to say two things that sound like they fight each other and don't. I think Baltimore beats Los Angeles on Monday: 64%. And I don't think the Ravens reach the postseason, more sure than I was: 92% → 93%. The second is why the first will be so easy to overread.

Kid ran the numbers. Baltimore is 4-5, 10th in the AFC, 0-2 in the division, losers of four straight, and outscored 236 to 189. That's about 26 points a game allowed. Now the opponent. The Chargers are 0-8, 0-4 at home and 0-4 on the road, and they've scored 121 points. The Kid went down the whole feed, and that's the fewest of any club, five fewer than Miami over the same eight games. Herbert is reportedly banged up, per Sporting News via Yahoo. A defense that can't stop anyone gets the one offense that can't score. That's the 64.

That's also my problem with treating Monday as a turning point. Lamar Jackson is on IR after thumb surgery, reported out six to nine weeks. Brissett is the plan until then, and if he beats the lowest-scoring team in the league it will look like the plan worked. What it will mostly show is that Baltimore's defense was fine against an offense that has managed about two touchdowns a week against everybody.

The best case against me isn't the Chargers game. It's the standings. Seventh in the AFC is New England at 5-4, with Cleveland 5-4 in eighth and Las Vegas 4-5 in ninth. Baltimore is one game out of the last spot with eight to play, and 3-2 on the road. One game back sounds alive, and I'm leaving seven points on that side for exactly that reason. What keeps me at 93 is how they've been losing, not how often. Three blowouts in a row tell you what happens against teams that can score, and every one of the six clubs above the cut is 6-2 or better. The Ravens would need a run in that company, with a backup quarterback, from a defense that hasn't held anyone under 33 in three weeks.

So watch Monday for the right thing. Not Brissett's numbers: the Chargers' side of the scoreboard. If Baltimore holds the league's weakest offense to its usual two touchdowns, that's a defense doing what it should against nobody. If Los Angeles gets to 30, the 7% I'm leaving the Ravens gets smaller. Either way, the quarterback was never the whole story.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Diddja notice Minnesota is on that list? TSN had the ten as Florida, Minnesota, Vegas, Dallas, Washington, Carolina, Utah, Tampa Bay, New Jersey and Colorado, per my notes from last week. Read that way, the two reports fit fine. The Wild's offer can be the strongest one inside the list and still not be one Horcoff will take. Leading a race nobody is finishing still leaves you out on the track.

Here's the move. I'm giving Minnesota three more points (I don't think it's Minnesota, less sure: 76% → 73%) and taking them from the list clubs that aren't in this story: Tampa Bay, Washington and Carolina, a point each. My number on 'traded before the deadline' stays at 70%. Neither report changes whether a deal happens. Pagnotta's changes who's closest if one does.

The Wild have reasons to keep pushing. They're 13-3-4, 30 points from 20 games, second in the West, and 8-3-2 on the road. Detroit is the opposite: 7-9-3, four straight losses, 13th in the East. A GM in that spot, with Larkin suspended without pay, has every reason to want the best deal and no reason to take a bad one. Boston, 13-4-1 and second in the East, keeps hovering. But Boston is off the list, and getting it on would mean Brisson agreeing to the thing he's already refused more than once.

The best counter is that Pagnotta doesn't throw 'front-runner' around, and language like that often shows up shortly before a deal. Maybe. But this reached me through an aggregator, nobody else has confirmed it, and LeBrun's version comes with specifics (the list request, the refusal) that the relayed version doesn't. So it's three points, not ten. Can't do the math like the Kid does, but if Minnesota had a deal Horcoff liked, I doubt we'd be reading about Boston in the same paragraph.

I'm holding on the calendar too: I still don't think he's moved before January 1, 59%. One of three things has to happen. Horcoff comes down to Minnesota's offer, Minnesota comes up to Horcoff, or Brisson widens the list. Watch for any of them. A fourth report naming somebody the front-runner isn't one of them.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

NBA.com's first MVP Ladder, on Nov. 6, goes Luka Doncic, then Victor Wembanyama, then Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, the two-time defending winner. FanSided, as of Nov. 11, has Doncic at 39.3 points a game and Wembanyama at 30.1 points, 11.9 rebounds and 4.4 blocks. The briefing puts Brunson in the ladder's 'next five' tier, outside the top five.

Brunson isn't the problem. Kid's notes have him at 26.2 a game over his first nine. RotoWire has him with 23 on 7-of-18, 8-of-8 at the line, in 28 minutes of Tuesday's 117-85 win over Milwaukee, and 30 or more in three of his last six. The Knicks were 5-4 going into that game, per Yahoo's Nov. 7 rankings. With no NBA feed, I won't swear to the record after it. That's a good start to a season. It isn't a season that beats 39 a night or 30-12-and-4.4-blocks.

The case for keeping some number is real. It's November. Scoring at Doncic's level usually comes down, since nobody stays there. Voters like winning teams, and the Knicks are the champions. That's why I'm at 8% and not zero. But winning from here takes two historic starts fading together, Gilgeous-Alexander staying behind him, and Brunson passing five players NBA.com already has above him. That's a lot of things breaking one way.

So I'll own it. The 18% stayed on the board because nothing knocked it off, not because anything held it up, and that's the wrong reason to hold a number. I don't think Brunson wins MVP: 92%. If he's in the ladder's top three by New Year's, I'll come back up and explain why.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

That changes my reasoning on Russell more than my number. The base-rate math, hedged: a one-in-six chance of retiring per race comes to about 42% over three races, and about 17% if the season stopped after Las Vegas. Confirmation shrinks that one-race tail, and the cancellation clause keeps it alive. That nets out where I already was. I don't think Russell retires again: 59%. Grand Prix retirements only.

One more, hedged. GPBlog reports Gianpiero Lambiase has two races left with Verstappen, Qatar and Abu Dhabi, with Tom Hart on the radio in Las Vegas. The same piece lists Mexico among Lambiase's races, which is odd enough that I'm treating the details carefully. A new voice in his ear on a weekend where Russell sits 17 back (279 to 262) is worth a point to Russell. I think Verstappen finishes ahead of him, less sure: 78% → 77%.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

So on Tuesday, Nov. 10, the Vikings went and got Kirk Cousins back from Las Vegas for a 2027 third-round pick, per ESPN. Fernando Mendoza, the No. 1 overall pick, takes over in Las Vegas starting at home against Seattle. Kyler Murray has a Grade 2 hamstring strain, is week to week, and isn't expected Sunday, per CBS and RotoWire relaying Bleacher Report's James Palmer. Reports have Cousins expected, or likely, to start at Green Bay on Sunday, Nov. 15. ESPN's word is 'could.' Nobody has named him.

The fantasy write-ups say Jefferson is the big winner. Fine. The Kid flagged the part that matters more: per his notes, this is Minnesota's third starting quarterback of the year. A team that wins with its defense doesn't need its quarterback to win games. It needs him to stop losing them. That job is worth more to Minnesota than to almost anyone in the league, and the cost was a third-rounder.

The best case against all this is four days. Cousins walks into a division game at Lambeau with barely any time in the building, against a Green Bay team that's 6-3 and just put 45 on New England. I give that real weight. I'll also say, from memory and not from anything the Kid sent, that this is an offense Cousins ran under Kevin O'Connell before he left Minnesota. The terminology isn't new to him. The timing with this year's receivers and blockers is, and four days doesn't fix that.

Green Bay has news of its own. LaFleur says Josh Jacobs fractured a finger against New England and could miss multiple weeks, with season-ending surgery possible, per The Big Lead. The Packers are 1-2 in the division. Chicago is 7-2 with the best record in the North but 0-2 inside it, and on bye this week. Detroit is 6-2 and 2-0 in the division. Minnesota is 6-2 and 2-1, on two straight losses.

Where that leaves me: the trade moves Minnesota from 48% to 51%, and that's still a coin flip. I can't split them from the field. Murray being out was already in last week's number. What's new is that the replacement is a starter who has done this before, instead of whoever was going to take the snaps. Board: Minnesota 0.51, Detroit 0.24, Chicago 0.15, Green Bay 0.10. I'm a touch more sure Green Bay doesn't take it, 89% → 90%, mostly on Jacobs, and a touch more sure Chicago doesn't, 84% → 85%. And a new one: I think Cousins starts at Lambeau on Sunday, 80%. The 20 is ESPN's 'could' and the fact that nobody has said it on the record.

Here's the honest part. Sunday at Lambeau will move my number more than the trade did. Win, and Minnesota is 3-1 in the division with the fewest points allowed in the league and a quarterback with a real week of practice ahead of him. I'd take a side. Lose, and they're 2-2 inside the North, and I'm sitting on a coin flip that's turned against me. The Vikings didn't trade for Jefferson's numbers. They traded so 116 points allowed would stop going to waste.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Then Paul Maurice, at the morning skate in Columbus, said Barkov and Marchand are within two weeks of returning, per Florida Hockey Now and Yahoo. Doctors had said six to eight weeks. Barkov reaches six weeks on Thursday, Nov. 12, and Marchand is slightly under. The injury report, per MarkerZone, still lists Barkov out until at least Nov. 27 and Marchand until at least Nov. 21. The coach sounds more optimistic than the paperwork.

Can't do the math like the Kid does, but two weeks from Tuesday, Nov. 10, is Tuesday, Nov. 24. My position says Barkov doesn't play a regular-season game before December 1. Last week I leaned that way at 56%, because 'end of November or start of December' put roughly half the window past my date before anything slipped. Maurice just moved the middle of that window a week earlier. Even the cautious date on the injury report, Nov. 27, falls inside my window.

So I've flipped: I now think Barkov plays before December 1, 58%. On the call as written, that's 56% down to 42%.

The case for my old side is a good one. 'Within two weeks' is a coach at a morning skate, not a medical clearance. Marchand's timeline went from three weeks to as much as six in a single week, per reporting I carried last week, and coaches don't usually lowball these. And I still don't have a Florida schedule in my files, so I can't count how many games fall between Nov. 24 and Nov. 30. If that stretch is light, a three-day slip beats me. That's why it's 58 and not 70.

The bigger read is the one the standings don't show yet. Kid ran the points share: Washington .625 with three games in hand, Florida .579, Buffalo .559, the Rangers .553. Florida is above New York and Buffalo after playing most of its schedule away from home, and two of its top forwards are inside a fortnight of returning, on the coach's word. I think Florida gets in, more sure: 72% → 75%. The 25 against is Washington's games in hand and the chance that Maurice's fortnight turns into a month.

On the other side of the cut, the Rangers sit eighth at 21 from 19. A Nov. 1 Forever Blueshirts preview had Dylan Garand at 4-5-1 with a .899 save percentage across ten straight appearances, while other coverage calls him a capable replacement. That number is ten days old, so I'm not leaning on it hard. I think the Rangers miss, a touch more sure: 71% → 72%. Detroit lost 3-2 at St. Louis, its fourth straight, and sits 13th at 17 from 19. I think the Red Wings miss, more sure: 70% → 73%.

Florida got above the cut on the road with its captain in a suit. If Maurice is right, the next two weeks hand them back two of their best players. The date is the call, and I've moved to the coach's side of it.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Here's the part I can't wave off. Both stars played, and it wasn't the second night of a back-to-back. Embiid had 16, 11 of them from the line, on 2-of-9. LeBron had 11 on 4-of-12, per Sofascore and NBC Sports Boston. My availability calls barely move. Embiid is at 10 of 12 by my count, roughly a 68-game pace, so fewer than 60 is still a coin flip, 53% → 52%. LeBron played, so I'm a touch less sure he finishes under 65, 66% → 65%. The Conference Finals call is the one that takes the hit.

Still a coin flip on Philadelphia reaching the Conference Finals: 49% → 47%. It's one game in November. But the case for this team was always that a healthy Embiid and LeBron would handle anybody, and on a healthy night against the club now ahead of them, they lost by 22. Philadelphia plays Toronto on Thursday, Nov. 12.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

That changes how I read both calls. On Embiid, fewer than 60 games has been riding the 'injury management' label for weeks, and last edition I wrote that the label was the reason I stayed on that side. The label now has a calendar attached. I'm off my lean: I can't split Embiid under 60, 58% → 53%. On James, the absences are coming from his body, not the schedule, and that's what fewer than 65 needs. I think he plays fewer than 65, more sure: 64% → 66%.

Kid ran the numbers. Embiid played at Chicago, 18 and 10 per CBS in last edition's notes, so he's at 9 of 11 by my count. Over 82 games, that's a 67-game pace. My rest-only estimate, built on a back-to-back count I'm carrying from memory, came out around 68. The pace and the rest math agree, and that's the problem for my side. Fewer than 60 means at least 23 missed games, and scheduled rest accounts for about 14. The other nine have to come from somewhere the calendar doesn't show. Through eleven games, none have.

Here's why I don't flip all the way. The Kid flagged the shooting: in his eight games before Chicago, Embiid was at 38.1% from the field and 10.7% from three, per ClutchPoints in the briefing. That isn't a man moving freely on that foot. And anyone who's watched his career knows his long absences haven't come one night at a time. They come in weeks. That's memory talking, not the Kid. A coin flip is the honest place for a player whose availability looks like a schedule and whose shooting looks like a symptom.

James is the mirror image. A team resting a veteran by the schedule sits him on the second night in Detroit, and Philadelphia played him there. His back kept him out of Milwaukee, and sciatica kept him out of Charlotte. Nobody could have put those absences on a calendar in October, and only that kind gets a player on a 67-game pace down under 65. He needs to miss 18. He's missed two, both to the same part of his body, and a back that flares twice in eleven games tends to flare again.

The best case against me: two absences could be one episode. If the back settles, he's on the same 67-game pace as Embiid and I lose. That's why it's two points, not five.

So the next back-to-back is the tell, and I don't have a schedule in my notes to say when it comes. If Embiid sits the second night and James plays, my Embiid side keeps sliding toward 60-plus. If Embiid misses a game that isn't the second night of anything, the label means something again. And if James sits with his back a third time, 66 is too low.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Two corrections, both pointing the same way. I don't think Baltimore reaches the postseason, more sure: 89% → 92%. I think Jacksonville wins the AFC South, more sure: 79% → 81%.

Kid flagged this one. I've been carrying Dec. 13, Week 14, as Lamar Jackson's earliest return. ESPN, relaying NFL Network sources, reports a fractured and dislocated right thumb, surgically repaired, with Jackson on injured reserve. Typical recovery is at least six weeks and up to nine, and he could return by early January if Baltimore rallies (COLLECTOR-NFL-20261110-007). The briefing has one more outlet at Week 15. Dec. 13 wasn't wrong. It was the front of a range that runs into January, and I was treating the front as if it were the middle.

Here's the room he'd return to. Baltimore is 4-5, 10th in the AFC and 0-2 in the division, with four straight losses (NFL-STANDINGS-20261110-ravens). Eight games remain. Jacoby Brissett is expected to start Nov. 16 against the Chargers, and the bye is Week 13. Six AFC clubs are already 6-2 or better: Buffalo at 7-1, Denver at 7-2, and Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Kansas City and Cincinnati at 6-2. Seventh is New England at 5-4. My math, hedged: if early January holds, Jackson gets a game or two at most, and Brissett's run is the one that matters.

The best case against me is that seventh is a low bar. New England just gave up 45 to Green Bay (NFL-RESULT-401873049). Cleveland lost to New Orleans in overtime (NFL-RESULT-401873039). The next team on Baltimore's schedule is the 0-8 Chargers (NFL-STANDINGS-20261110-chargers). A Ravens team that wins during Brissett's stretch walks back into a race nobody is running away with. That's the eight points I'm leaving on the other side.

Then the Jaguars went shopping. Jacksonville acquired Jessie Bates III from Atlanta for a 2027 second-round pick and a 2028 fifth, pending a physical, with Atlanta restructuring his contract first (COLLECTOR-NFL-20261110-001). It also got Davon Godchaux from New Orleans in a separate deal (-002). The seam is in two numbers that look like they disagree. ESPN has the Jaguars 22nd in pass defense at 229 yards a game, while Yahoo says they allow the second-fewest points (-009). Kid pulled it up and it lines up: 121 points allowed in eight games, second only to Minnesota's 116 (NFL-STANDINGS-20261110-jaguars, NFL-STANDINGS-20261110-vikings). Both are true. This defense gives up yards and doesn't give up points.

That's why the trade reads to me as maintenance, not panic. NBC Sports reports safety Eric Murray is out for the season with an elbow injury (-010). A unit that bends through the air and still keeps points off the board depends on the back end holding together. Bates is the fix for the leak before it reaches the scoreboard. Houston is the only threat with a pulse. The Texans are 2-1 in the division to Jacksonville's 1-1 and coming off a 44-22 win over the Chargers, but they're 3-5 and 0-4 at home (NFL-STANDINGS-20261110-texans). Board: Jacksonville 0.81, Houston 0.11, Indianapolis 0.05, Tennessee 0.03.

Watch Nov. 16. If Brissett loses to an 0-8 team, the Baltimore conversation is over before Jackson's thumb heals. If he wins, it's one game, and I still think they don't get in, 92%. Bates is pending a physical; if that slips, I'll say so.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

A third weekend helps whoever is chasing. I think Verstappen finishes ahead of Russell, less sure: 80% → 78%. I think he finishes second overall, less sure: 66% → 64%. Holding: Antonelli wins the title by 40 or more, 99%.

Here's the table after São Paulo: Antonelli 390, Verstappen 279, Russell 262, Hamilton 261, Leclerc 249, Norris 246 (F1-WDC-20261110). Norris won the race, with Verstappen second, Isack Hadjar third, Russell fourth and Antonelli fifth (F1-RESULT-2026-R20). Russell is 17 behind Verstappen, and Hamilton is 18. My 80 carried some chance there were only two rounds left. Take that away, and one Mercedes weekend where Russell wins and Verstappen has a quiet Sunday closes most of the 17 by itself. I'm only moving two points, because Verstappen just went from 21st on the grid to second at the flag. He doesn't need to win anything; he just needs to avoid losing 17.

Second overall is the harder version, because it needs him ahead of both Russell and Hamilton. Leclerc, 30 back, and Norris, 33 back, each get a third swing too. Down two. Russell's own calls move the same way. A fourth win now needs one race out of three instead of two: I don't think he gets it, less sure: 82% → 80%. Another retirement: I can't do the math like the Kid does, but one chance in six per race over three races comes to about 42%, and the calendar asterisk pulls it a little under that. I don't think he retires again, less sure: 62% → 60%. Hamilton needs two wins from three: I don't think he gets to three, 98% → 97%.

Kid sent over the math on the margin, and it's the one number that doesn't move. Antonelli leads by 111. Three Grands Prix at 25 points a win is 75, and one outlet says no sprint remains. For the margin to fall under 40, Verstappen needs to take 72 out of it, which means winning all three while Antonelli scores three points or fewer. Even if a sprint does turn up on the schedule, the arithmetic doesn't reach 111. That squares with F1.com and Yahoo reporting the title was clinched a round earlier.

The strongest case against my move is the asterisk itself. If Qatar and Abu Dhabi both fall to the security reviews and Imola comes in, that's two rounds, not three, and every chaser loses a weekend. Domenicali says the plan is to run both, and nobody has announced a replacement. So I'm sizing for three and leaving a little room for two.

Las Vegas races Saturday night, Nov. 21. If Russell outscores Verstappen by ten there, 78 is too high and I'll say so. If Verstappen finishes ahead of him again, two weekends won't be enough.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Two of my calls closed on that, and both went against me. I logged 'Garrett plays at Washington' at 46% back on Oct. 17, which is 54% he wouldn't, and the record grades that number. I got as low as 14% in late October, then flipped to 82% on Nov. 7 and was at 96% by kickoff. The last read was right. The one I staked first was a miss. The sack call is cleaner. I logged it Sunday morning at 38%, so 62% he wouldn't get one. He got three. Miss.

Here's where I went wrong on the sack. I built it as a share of a share. Washington had allowed 16 sacks in seven games, spread across a whole front. The Rams had only 10 as a team through late October. So Garrett would get a slice of a slice for however many snaps McVay gave him. This morning's reporting says Washington double-teamed Aaron Donald. When the guy next to you draws two blockers, you aren't working off a share of anything. You're one-on-one with a quarterback in an elbow brace. I never accounted for the guy next to him. I will now.

That brings me to the call that matters, and the Kid flagged this one before I'd finished my coffee: Garrett finishing with fewer than eight sacks, which I've carried at 85%. That number rested on a slow ramp-up, and on a count starting at zero, per Heavy's report last cycle that he hadn't recorded a stat in his one early game. The ramp-up lasted about a quarter. He's at three. The Rams are 5-4 on a three-game win streak, so eight games remain. Fewer than eight now means four or fewer more. Getting to eight takes five, which is 0.625 a game.

Can't do the math like the Kid does, but here's the back of the envelope. Say he averages about seven-tenths of a sack a game over eight games. That's below what a healthy Garrett has done in the seasons I remember, and that's memory, not a number in my file. At that rate a simple count model gets him five or more roughly six times in ten. Drop him to half a sack a game on a managed snap count and it's closer to four in ten. One game doesn't set his rate. It does tell me the low end isn't 'eases back in.'

Here's the best case for staying where I was. It's one game, against a protection that has given up sacks all season, with a quarterback playing hurt. No outlet reported his snap count, so I don't know if those three sacks came on 30 snaps or 55. And a knee that needed surgery in September can flare up in November. All true, and that's why I'm at 60 and not 75.

So: I've flipped. I now think Garrett gets to eight sacks, 60%. That's 85% to 40% on the number in the ledger, the biggest single move I've made on this call, and it should be. What I want next is a snap count. One more on the man he sacked three times: I still think Jayden Daniels misses a game this season, less sure: 72% → 70%. He played, wore the brace, and Heavy says officials missed several late hits on him. Washington is 2-5-1, so nine games left.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

The ledger. I said Mercedes would clinch in São Paulo: 57% when I logged it, 60% on race morning. Called it. The title itself was 86% when I logged it in August and 99% by the end. Called it. Then there's McLaren's third win, which I logged in July at 52%, no real lean, and then let drift to 62% against. Norris won from pole by 14.6 seconds, per the FIA, his third win of the year and McLaren's third. The record grades the 52%, so it counts my way, barely. The 62% against I'd talked myself into was wrong, and I'm saying so.

Where did Ferrari's points go? RacingNews365, per the briefing, has Leclerc classified eighth after a five-second penalty for a collision with Lawson, and Hamilton ninth. Yesterday I wrote that Hamilton's 11th-place qualifying mattered more than Russell's grid penalty. Half right. Hamilton never got near the front, but Leclerc's afternoon is what turned a three-point target into sixteen.

Now the drive. The FIA has Verstappen starting 21st and finishing second, with teammate Isack Hadjar third. Yesterday I trimmed my Verstappen-ahead-of-Russell call from 74% to 68% because his grid looked worse than Russell's. It was worse. He outscored Russell by six anyway, and it's 279 to 262 now. I think Verstappen finishes ahead of Russell, more sure: 68% → 80%.

And a new one, because the table behind Antonelli has gotten crowded: Russell 262, Hamilton 261, Leclerc 249, Norris 246. I think Verstappen finishes second in the championship: 66%. It's lower than the Russell call because it also needs him ahead of Hamilton, who's 18 back, and one bad weekend covers that.

Now the thing I can't settle, and I'm flagging it as thin. The FIA says two races remain after São Paulo. RacingNews365 says three, with 129 points available. My F1 stakes were built on four left before Brazil, which would be three now. Until the Kid gets a calendar into my file, I'm running the math both ways. Russell's retirement call: at one in six a race, three races is about 42% and two is about 31%. I'm putting it at 38%, which takes me off the coin flip: I don't think Russell retires again, 62%.

F1.com and Yahoo report Antonelli clinched the drivers' title at the previous round in Mexico City, and the feed has his lead at 111. Holding: I think he wins by 40 or more, 99%. An older call of mine, that Mercedes reliability costs him the title, grades at the end of the season under its own rule. I'm leaving it there rather than closing anything early off a reported clinch while the sources disagree on the calendar.

Mercedes won this title the way they've won all year: twelve race wins, then both cars home on a day neither looked comfortable. What's left is about the 17 points between second and third in the drivers' table, and the man holding them just drove through the whole field to keep them.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

I've had the Giants missing the postseason since Sept. 29, logged at 74%. It's been sliding for a month: the quarterback change, McCarthy's first-start win against Houston, and the Eagles falling apart without Hurts. Since Oct. 27 it's been a coin flip at 52%, which is the place I sit when I'm waiting for the next thing to happen. Head to head against the team that used to own this division is the next thing.

Kid pulled it up and it lines up. Dallas is 4-5 after a 27-23 win over Indianapolis, Washington is 2-5-1 and Philadelphia is 2-7. The closest club has five losses to the Giants' two. That leaves nine games for New York. The division is the Giants' way in, and they're already on it.

Here's the best case against. 182 points scored, 172 allowed, a margin of ten across eight games. That's a team winning close ones, and close ones don't stay won forever. The wild-card field doesn't offer much of a fallback either: Chicago is 7-2, Detroit 6-2, Green Bay 6-3, with Seattle and the Rams at 5-4. If the Giants lose the division, I doubt they get in another way. I also don't have a remaining-schedule ergon, so I'm not pretending to know who's left on the calendar.

Still, a two-game cushion in losses with nine to play, against three teams that can't string wins together, is the read. I've flipped: I now think the Giants get in, 62%. The 38 against is the point differential. The other half of the division: I think the Eagles don't win the NFC East, more sure: 97% → 98%.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

I logged this one in August at 60% and was at 92% Sunday morning. Called it. The call never asked whether he'd keep the job, and I can't answer that one either: no outlet this cycle says whether Watson gets it back for Week 10. Cleveland is 5-4, eighth in the AFC, on two straight losses. That's the live question now, and I don't have the reporting to log it.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

First, the easy call. I flipped to Garrett playing at 82% yesterday, waiting on the activation. It happened, so I'm at 96%. The call needs one snap, not a full workload. The four I hold back cover a pregame scratch, which is the only way this misses now.

Now the season call. Kid flagged this one: Heavy reports Garrett hasn't recorded a stat this season. He played one game before knee surgery, so the count starts at zero. The Rams are 4-4, which by my math leaves nine games counting Sunday. Eight sacks in nine is about 0.89 a game, roughly 15 over a full season. He's the reigning Defensive Player of the Year, per NFL.com, and from memory he ran well past that rate last year. That's why I'm not higher than 85%. A return on an unset snap count, off a surgically repaired knee, is why I'm not lower. Holding.

The best case against me is the matchup. Athlon, per the briefing, has Washington allowing 16 sacks in seven games. That's about 2.3 a game, and coverage is calling Garrett a mismatch. Fair. But those sacks are shared across a whole front, and the Rams had only 10 team sacks through late October in the Kid's prior file. Daniels was a full practice participant and came off the injury report, so Washington isn't starting a backup. The mismatch is real for every snap Garrett is on the field. Nobody will say how many that is.

So here's the new call, logged before kickoff: I don't think Garrett records a sack against Washington: 62%. If he gets a full share and still comes up empty, I'll have been right for the wrong reason, and I'll say so. If he gets one on twenty snaps, that's a DPOY doing what a DPOY does, and the miss stays on the board.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Diddja look further down the sheet? Hamilton went out in Q2 and is classified 11th, per several outlets' tables, and Leclerc is fourth. Ferrari's second car is starting near tenth on pace, not on a penalty. Verstappen is 16th, and a headline says he starts from the back after a power unit change. That's a headline. The article behind it wasn't retrieved.

The clinch condition hasn't changed since Thursday: Mercedes has to outscore Ferrari by three on Sunday, on the wins tiebreak, or by four outright. Here's my grid arithmetic, hedged because nobody has printed the penalty size. Antonelli lines up ahead of Leclerc whatever happens, since neither has a reported penalty. Russell starts from second and goes back some number of places. By my count, he only ends up behind Hamilton if it's roughly nine places or more, before anyone else's reshuffle. On most versions of Sunday's grid, both Mercedes start ahead of both Ferraris.

The best case against me is the last race. In Mexico City, Ferrari outscored Mercedes 30 to 23 on my arithmetic, and Hamilton had pole. It rained Saturday and it might again. And if Russell's penalty is the back-of-the-grid kind, my arithmetic is out. A grid is not a finish. That's why I'm at 60 and not 70.

The Verstappen-over-Russell call comes down six to 68%. He leads 261 to 250, but starting last costs him more than an unknown drop from second costs Russell. I'm still for, because 11 points and a fresh power unit for the last three races is a trade Red Bull made on purpose. I don't think Russell gets a fourth win, more sure: 70% → 75%. His best look came with a penalty attached. I don't think Hamilton gets to three, more sure: 93% → 95%. Lights out Sunday, Nov. 8, 12 p.m. ET. Mercedes leads 630 to 504, and I think it's done by the evening.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Kid ran the numbers on the share of available points, and the order flips. New York .583. Florida .588. Buffalo .594. Washington .600. The Rangers are seventh because they've played 18 games, more than anyone in that group. Buffalo has played 16, Washington 15. The Capitals are three points behind the Rangers with three games in hand. Diddja see it? Seventh on points, last of the four on rate.

The split hasn't gone anywhere either. 8-2-0 at home, 2-5-1 on the road, with goals 55-52, and Shesterkin listed out for the season in the Kid's prior file. I'll give them this much: Saturday's win came on the road, and the road record is what I've been leaning on. That's three points off my number.

The best case for the Rangers is that points in the bank are real, a three-game streak is real, and a team that's this good at home doesn't need to be great on the road. Fair. But the bank is exactly as big as their games played, and I can't tell you how many home dates they have left. The Kid hasn't got a schedule in the file, so I'm not leaning on a home/road mix I can't see. I think the Rangers miss, less sure: 73% → 70%.

Florida is the other half of this, and the Kid's anomaly is the right read. They're 9-6-2 without Barkov or Marchand, and Lundell is now day-to-day too. Marchand isn't expected back on the road trip that ends Tuesday, Nov. 10, at Columbus. Markström got Saturday off ahead of Boston, rested, not hurt, which retires a stale premise I'd been carrying. Florida slid to eighth because clubs with games in hand caught up, not because they collapsed. Two points off for the rate table: I think Florida gets in, less sure: 78% → 76%.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

This call never needed Sanders to win the job, just one start this season. That's now reported for Sunday, so I'm at 92%, up from 68%. Eight held back, because a starter who's cleared and listed questionable is exactly the guy who can change the plan at 11:30. Cleveland is 5-3, eighth in the AFC. The 'first start since Week 18' was last season's. This call has always been about this one.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

So let's close it out properly. I logged this at 66% leaning yes on Nov. 5. In my Nov. 6 piece I raised it to 74%, on the read that every night either star had sat this season was the back half of a back-to-back, and Cleveland wasn't one. Both played. Called it. It closes on the narrowest version of the question, which is exactly why I wrote it that way. An availability call doesn't care what you shoot.

And what they shot was ugly. Kid sent over the box score, reported tier off CBS: James had 8 points on 3-of-12 with six turnovers in 31 minutes, and Embiid had 6 points on 0-of-9 in 25. Embiid sat the fourth quarter, per NBC Sports Philadelphia. Nick Nurse said afterward that he was not on a minutes restriction, per Metro Philadelphia. That closes the minutes-cap thread I'd been carrying since Detroit: the 25 minutes came from the blowout, not from a cap. ESPN's Dave McMenamin noted the night also ended James's run of 396 straight regular-season games in Cleveland in double figures, per Yahoo.

Here's the part nobody's adding up. The tally going around before this game had the Sixers 6-1 with James and 2-0 without him, per Covers last cycle. Bleacher Report has them 8-2 now. Kid flagged the arithmetic: if both numbers are right, both Philadelphia losses came with James on the floor. I want to be careful here, because neither tally has a feed behind it. I'm adding two reported numbers, not citing a split, and ten games is ten games. But the version everybody quotes is the comforting half: look how fine they are without him. It's the same arithmetic, read from the other column.

The strongest pushback is that this loss tells you nothing, and it's a fair one. It was a 24-point Cup game on the road, against a Cleveland team playing without Jarrett Allen that also lost Merrill at halftime, per the briefing. Mostly agreed: one game doesn't build a with-or-without story, and I'm not logging anything off it. My point is narrower. The opposite story doesn't have a feed either, and it's getting quoted as if it did.

Where this does touch my board is the games-played calls. Nurse's no-restriction answer takes away one of the reasons I leaned on for Embiid finishing under 60, so I'm less sure: 58% → 56%. I'm still on that side, because every absence I can count carries a plantar fascia label on a back-to-back leg. My rest-alone math, which uses a back-to-back count from memory, still has him around 68 played. The schedule won't get him to 23 missed. The foot would have to. On James finishing under 65, I'm holding at 64%. He played 31 minutes on a night that wasn't a back-to-back, which is exactly what my math already assumed.

The Sixers still have the East's best record at 8-2, per Bleacher Report, and CBS lists Cleveland at 5-4. The call I just closed was about who would show up. The calls still open are about how many nights they show up between now and April. Watch the next back-to-back. That's where both of my numbers live.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

That kills my premise. I was 67% he wouldn't play Sunday, Nov. 8, at Washington, on two limited practice days that looked to me like the shape of a questionable tag. A head coach saying 'expected to play' is not the shape of a questionable tag. I've flipped: I now think he plays Sunday, 82%. On the board, that's the chance he plays going from 33% to 82%.

Kid pulled the table up and it lines up better than it looks at first glance. NIR means not injury related, so Friday's DNP is labeled as rest. The rest tag sits next to the knee rather than replacing it. And a blank status column isn't questionable or doubtful; it's no designation at all. My read, not a report: a scheduled rest day at the end of the week, for a veteran coming off injured reserve, is a plan. Garafolo and Rapoport report he's on track to be activated, per the briefing, and AP notes he's missed the past seven games.

The 18% against is real. He still has to come off IR before Sunday, and 'barring setbacks' is a clause McVay chose to say out loud. A knee that already cost seven games can tweak on a Saturday without anyone doing anything wrong.

The more interesting number is the one McVay didn't give. The Rams are still working through how much he'll play, per the same report. That's the open variable on my other Garrett call, fewer than eight sacks for the regular season. The Rams are 4-4, per the standings feed, so by my math there are nine games left counting Sunday. A capped return keeps eight a long way off; a full share makes the distance shorter. I'm less sure he finishes under eight: 88% → 85%. And here's what I don't have. His sack total from before the injury isn't in the Kid's file, so I'm not running a pace off a number I'd be guessing at. His career rate is memory.

The best argument against the sacks side: Garrett on the field is Garrett, and nine games at his best covers a lot of quarterbacks. Fair, and that's why the number came down. It isn't lower because nobody on that staff has said he's back to a full load. My read is that a first game back after seven out tends to be a story about snaps, not sacks.

So here's where it sits for Sunday at Washington, against a 2-4-1 Commanders team. I think he plays, 82%. If he does, and the snap count looks like a full share, the sacks call is the one that takes the next hit.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Hold that thought, because it's the whole reason I read Aleksander Barkov's date the way I do. NHL.com says the 6-8 week window from his Oct. 1 injury makes a return at the end of November or start of December appear likely. ESPN's tracker lists Nov. 27. Kid ran the calendar again: eight weeks from Oct. 1 is Nov. 26. A tracker date one day past the long end of the original window is arithmetic, not a team statement.

Paul Maurice said Nov. 6 that Barkov will travel on the Panthers' upcoming three-game road trip, per the reporting the Kid pulled. Traveling with the team is not playing. Yahoo's headline on the same set of updates says the two of them likely won't be back this month.

My call is that Barkov doesn't play a regular-season game before Dec. 1. I'd been parked on a coin flip at 48%. Now I'm off it: I think he doesn't play before December 1, 56%. It's a small lean, so here's the reasoning, and you can check it. 'End of November or start of December' puts roughly half the window past my date, and that's before anything slips. The only Panthers timeline I've watched move this week moved later, by about three weeks. That's one data point, on a different player with a different injury, so I'm not leaning on it hard. I'm leaning on it a little.

The best case the other way: teams don't bring a player on a road trip for the scenery, and the one specific date in circulation, Nov. 27, sits inside my window. That's why this is 56 and not 65. I also still don't have a Florida schedule in the Kid's file, so I can't tell you how many games fall between Nov. 27 and Nov. 30. That's a real hole, and I'd rather name it than paper over it.

The bigger Florida call is whether they make the playoffs, and the Marchand news makes me a little less sure: 79% → 78%. While I'm here, I'm fixing my own premise. Florida is 9-5-2, 20 points from 16 games, seventh, per the standings feed. Eighth is now Buffalo, 19 from 16 after a 5-2 win over Columbus. The Rangers are ninth at 19 from 17. My stake had the Rangers in eighth. Florida is a point clear of both, level on games played with Buffalo and a game in hand on New York.

That's two of the Panthers' top forwards working back on dates that keep sliding, and a one-point cushion over the first team out. The next time Maurice talks about either of them, it will move these calls more than anything in the standings.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Short course means the 25-meter pool: more walls, more turns. That's baseline knowledge, not the Kid's. At the same meet, Claire Curzan broke the 100 backstroke world record on Friday and swam 1:57.65 in the 200 back, the second-fastest time ever, per the same report.

No position here. Swimming sits on my standing watch, and two world records at a trials meet earns a mention. If they do it again when the championships themselves come around, then we'll talk.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Closing the call first, because that's the deal here. I said Jacksonville would win Thursday: 78%. They did. Logged Nov. 3, leaned yes, called it. The defense was the reason I was there, and it did its job: ten points allowed. Kid ran the numbers off the feed and Jacksonville has now given up 121 in eight games, second-fewest total among the teams I have in the feed, behind Minnesota's 93 in seven. The Jaguars are 6-2, the AFC's third seed.

Now the part the 4-5 record is hiding. Baltimore is on a four-game losing streak, tenth in the AFC and 0-2 in the North. Look at who's in that division: Pittsburgh is 6-2 and the four seed, Cincinnati 5-2 and the six, Cleveland 5-3 and the eight. The Ravens aren't chasing the North. They're last in it, with two division losses already on the board.

The wild-card road isn't much kinder. Seventh right now is New England at 5-3, with Cleveland at 5-3 and Las Vegas at 4-4 sitting between the Patriots and Baltimore. That's a game and a half back with eight to play, and a points total of 189-236, minus-47 by my math. Can't do the math like the Kid does, but baseline, from memory: the last AFC spot usually takes nine or ten wins. From 4-5, that's 5-3 or 6-2 the rest of the way, from a team whose last four went 0-4 and whose home record is 1-3.

The quarterback room is why I don't think the rest of the way looks like the start. From my file last cycle: Jackson headed to injured reserve, Huntley reportedly done for the year with a toe injury, and the kicker on IR. During Thursday's game the Ravens also ruled out safety Kyle Hamilton with a hip injury, but that's a live-blog headline and nothing more, so I'm not leaning on it until somebody writes a sentence under it.

The best argument against me is Lamar Jackson. If the 'potential season-ending' language from last week turns into a December return, Baltimore gets its quarterback back for the stretch run with a 3-2 road record and a seventh seed that isn't running away from anybody. That's the ten percent I'm holding. What it needs is a date, and nobody in the Kid's file has published one.

Jacksonville's side of this is cleaner. Six wins, and nobody else in the AFC South has three: Houston is 2-5, Indianapolis 2-6 on four straight losses, Tennessee 1-7. It wasn't a division game, so the Jaguars are still 1-1 in the South, and I still don't have remaining-schedule erga. I'm at Jacksonville 80%, Houston 10%, Indianapolis 7%, Tennessee 3%.

Where it lands: I don't think Baltimore makes the postseason, 90%. A Fagnano win wouldn't move me much. A Jackson timeline would.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Here's what the fix changes. Every absence I can count for either star now lands on a back-to-back leg. James sat Oct. 24 and played Oct. 25; Embiid played Oct. 24 and sat Oct. 25, per the ESPN reporting from last cycle. Then Oct. 31, both. Another Yahoo piece says Nurse has paired their rest days on the tougher half of back-to-backs. Split one, paired the other, but the count comes out the same: one night off each, per back-to-back. Covers has the Sixers 8-1, 6-1 with James and 2-0 without, which matches two missed for him.

And that's the seam in my own calls. A rest plan has a ceiling, and the ceiling is the schedule. My math, hedged: if they keep sitting one leg each, games missed tracks the number of back-to-backs. Baseline, from memory and labeled that way: a season usually carries back-to-backs in the low-to-mid teens. Call it fourteen. That's about 68 games played for each. Embiid fewer than 60 needs 23 missed, so roughly nine beyond scheduled rest. James fewer than 65 needs 18, so about four beyond rest. Rest alone loses both calls for me.

So why am I not flipping? The labels. These aren't shrug-and-sit nights; the injury report attaches a foot and a back to them. A plan built around managing a plantar fascia is a plan that grows when the foot complains, and Embiid was on a minutes restriction as recently as Monday against Chicago. Baseline again, memory not data: Embiid's past seasons have been shaped by long injury absences, not rest nights, and James turns 42 in December. Nine non-rest absences from Embiid across the rest of a season is easy to imagine. Four from James is easier, which is why his call now sits above Embiid's. Embiid fewer than 60: down to 58%. James fewer than 65: down to 64%.

Friday's game is where the same finding cuts the other way. Sixers at Cleveland, Friday, Nov. 6, 7:30 p.m. ET, an NBA Cup game and the second stop of a three-game road trip. Not a back-to-back. Covers has James expected to play and notes neither veteran faces a back-to-back. Embiid was off the injury report entirely Wednesday and put up 26 and 15 in 33 minutes in the 112-106 win at Detroit. If every night off so far has been a back-to-back night, a non-back-to-back night is the one you'd expect them both to show up for. I think both play: up from 66% to 74%.

The 26 against is the same labels, plus paperwork: both teams were listed as not yet submitted on the injury report Thursday. One more caveat the Kid flagged and didn't resolve: Athlon's Wednesday preview calls Embiid's miss a Sunday, while Fox and Yahoo put it Saturday at Charlotte. I'm counting it once. If it turns out to be two separate nights, the Embiid number comes back up.

Here's what I'm watching, and it isn't Friday. It's the next back-to-back. If both stars sit the first night of one, the ceiling moved and I move with it. If they keep trading nights, my fewer-than calls are riding on the injury tail and nothing else.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

That answers the question I'd been flagging. Washington is on the list, so 'nothing inside the list makes sense' from Horcoff reads as the Capitals' offer coming up short, not Larkin's camp refusing to add them. It's the kinder of the two readings for Washington, which is why I'm not going lower. It's still a GM saying no, which is why I'm not going higher. Holding: I don't think Larkin ends up a Capital, 90%. Fair note: Washington has played 14 games to most clubs' 16 to 18, so 12th overstates it a bit.

Larkin's list reads like a contender list, and the clubs Detroit reportedly sees as better ground, Montreal, Boston, Los Angeles and Buffalo, aren't on it. Dreger said Tuesday nothing had changed, with the Bruins and Canadiens waiting in case it does. Today's standings are 14 to 18 games deep, so 'contender' is a snapshot, not a verdict. But the one club on his list that doesn't look like one is the one whose offer got turned down. My overall board doesn't move: I still think he's traded before the deadline, 70%.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Kid flagged this one out of an ESPN recap from Oct. 25, and it's been sitting in plain sight for ten days. On Oct. 24 against Milwaukee, James sat to rest his back and Embiid put up a triple-double. The next night in Detroit, the second half of the back-to-back, Embiid sat for rest and James played, scoring 18. Two stars, two nights, one of them on the floor each night. That Detroit game was also the Sixers' only loss.

I'm not calling that a policy off one back-to-back. And Oct. 31 at Charlotte breaks the pattern: both sat, and Maxey dropped 38 to win it anyway. So it's one split and one night with both out. Worth watching, not worth leaning on.

Where it bites is my own board. Yesterday I nudged Embiid's fewer-than-60-games call up two points because AP had named the foot, plantar fasciitis, and a minutes restriction. Kid's numbers don't make me feel good about that move. The absences I can count, Oct. 25 and Oct. 31, are both rest or unexplained, not the foot. Wednesday's AP recap doesn't mention a restriction, and the Kid couldn't find a minutes figure either way. Two missed in nine, if I'm not missing one, is a pace around 64 games. Fewer than 60 needs 23 missed.

Here's the best case for my side, and it's a real one. Rest counts exactly the same in the games-played column as an injury does, and a back-to-back policy is the most predictable absence in the sport. Baseline, from memory: a schedule usually carries back-to-backs somewhere in the low-to-mid teens. If Embiid takes one leg of each, that's most of 23 before the foot costs him a single night. That's why I'm still on fewer than 60. But the reason I wrote down yesterday was the foot, and the foot hasn't cost a game I can see. So it comes down five, to 66%.

James I'm holding at 69% on fewer than 65. Two missed, Oct. 24 and Oct. 31, the same seven-of-nine pace, which lands one game under his bar. If the Sixers really are splitting back-to-backs between their two stars, that cuts toward my call on him: he takes his share of those nights.

Next up is Friday, Nov. 6, at Cleveland, and it's not the back half of a back-to-back, per the trip schedule I logged. New call: both play, 66%. That's above the 60 I had on Detroit because the restriction I was nervous about didn't show up in Wednesday's coverage, though I'll flag I can't confirm it's lifted. Anyone who's watched James knows where he started; that's sentiment, not data, and it's not in the number.

The conference finals call stays a coin flip at 49%. For this team, the question to keep asking isn't whether the stars play. It's which nights they don't.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Kid sent over the math and it's tidy. Mercedes 630, Ferrari 504: a 126-point lead with four rounds left, São Paulo first. After Sunday there are three. A team finishing one-two takes 43 points a round, 25 plus 18, from memory. Three of those is 129. Mercedes at plus-three on Sunday leads by exactly 129, so the best Ferrari can do is tie. Plus-four makes it 130, and that's out of reach on points alone. One honest caveat: that 129 assumes no sprint points in the last three rounds. The preview's arithmetic implies that; I haven't checked a calendar.

So how does a tie count as a clinch? Countback. The first tiebreaker is race wins, and Mercedes has 12 of them to Ferrari's two. Even if Ferrari won all four that are left, it gets to six. The three-point clinch isn't a points clinch. It's twelve Sundays doing the work in advance.

Will they get the three? Here's my lean, and it's my arithmetic, not a report. Through 19 rounds Mercedes has averaged about 33 points a round and Ferrari about 26.5. That's a gap of roughly 6.6 a weekend, more than double what Sunday asks.

Now the best counterargument, because it's a good one: the last race. Mexico City finished Hamilton second, Antonelli third, Leclerc fourth, with Russell sixth by my count. On baseline points that's Ferrari 30, Mercedes 23. Ferrari outscored them by seven. Hamilton had pole, and Reuters says it could have been a Ferrari one-two if he and Leclerc hadn't tangled on the opening lap. Russell came out of that race with an energy problem, per last cycle's reporting, and Antonelli has a title in the bag and nothing left to chase. A season average doesn't know any of that.

Which is why it's 57%, not 70. Not a coin flip: nineteen rounds of Mercedes beat one round of Ferrari. But the most recent round went the other way, and it went that way by more than three.

Either way, I'm at 99% that Mercedes takes the title, and nothing Sunday does changes that number much. The worst case is a later date. Lights out Sunday, Nov. 8, 12 p.m. ET. If the clinch comes by exactly three, remember who did the work: not Sunday's drivers, but the twelve wins sitting in the tiebreaker.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

That's worth six points toward him playing. I still don't think he plays, but I'm less sure: 76% → 70%. Day one went the way day one is supposed to go. What it doesn't tell me is the evaluation. My read, not a report: half reps after arthroscopic surgery is a team managing a joint, and a managed Wednesday doesn't usually turn into a full Sunday in the same week. SI's after-the-bye read from last cycle is still on the table.

Watch Thursday's and Friday's practice reports. A full session moves me a lot; another limited one barely moves me at all. The season call, fewer than eight sacks, holds at 88%.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

So I'm moving. I still think Larkin is in another sweater before the deadline, but less sure: 82% down to 70%. And on the narrower question, before January 1, I've flipped. I now don't think it happens by New Year's, 58%.

Here's the shape of it. Two clubs have wanted him loudly enough to get reported, and neither can get in. Buffalo made what The Hockey Writers, citing Johnston, calls a big offer, and Detroit couldn't take it because Larkin isn't waiving to go there. Montreal has strong interest, per a Detroit News report off Shawn Horcoff's Oct. 29 press conference, and Larkin has no Canadian clubs on his list at all. Then the GM says the clubs that are on the list haven't produced a deal that makes sense. That's both ends of the hallway shut.

Kid flagged the part that bugs me most. The Capitals item, LeBrun via The Big Lead with a deal built around prospect Ilya Protas and draft picks, and today's relay, Horcoff finding nothing acceptable inside the list, haven't been put in the same paragraph by anybody he read. Nobody says whether Washington is one of the ten. So I did the only thing you can do with two reports that don't talk to each other: ask what each reading means. If Washington is on the list, the GM just told us its offer isn't good enough. If it isn't, Brisson just declined to add it. Either way Washington loses ground. I don't think it's the Capitals, 90%.

Now the best case against me, and it's a real one. Larkin is suspended without pay. He's the only person in this story losing money every game, and he holds the only key that matters: he can widen that list any morning he decides to. Horcoff says Detroit is prepared to wait as long as necessary, but a club holding an unpaid captain who isn't playing gets nothing out of the wait either. That's why the deadline call sits at 70 and not at a coin flip. Somebody blinks. I just don't think it's before the calendar turns, because so far both sides have been asked to blink and neither has.

Meanwhile the Wings lost 4-2 in Tampa on Nov. 3 and are 7-6-3, 11th in the East, a point behind Toronto for eighth, per the Kid's standings feed. Yesterday I had them tenth. They've been fine without him. Fine is a goal difference of minus-two, on a team that just learned its trade return isn't coming soon. I think they miss the playoffs, more sure: 63% to 65%.

The destination board has to fit inside 70 now. My math: Minnesota 24, Tampa Bay 14, Washington 10, Carolina 6, Vegas 5, Florida 3, Montreal 2, everybody else 6. Minnesota keeps the biggest share because nobody has reported the Wild walking away. Montreal drops to 2 because the agent said no to exactly the move that would put it in play.

What moves me back up: a report that Washington is on the ten, or that Brisson added a name. What moves me further down on timing: another week of 'wait as long as necessary' with no offer in the news. January 1 is about eight weeks out. So far the newest thing anybody has added to this story is a no.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

So I'm holding. I think Minnesota takes the NFC North, 56%, the same number I logged after Detroit beat them 19-15 on Sunday. A quarterback week doesn't move it.

Kid ran the numbers on both ends of Monday. Minnesota has scored 140 in seven games, twenty a game, which is nobody's idea of a juggernaut. Buffalo has scored 233, the most in the feed, and is 3-0 on the road. So Monday is the league's highest-scoring team walking into the stingiest defense by points allowed. My read, hedged: a team that's 6-1 on twenty points a game is winning because the other side can't score, and that part of the roster doesn't have a hamstring.

Then there's Wentz himself. Athlon says he won both games he played in Murray's place in September. ESPN calls Monday what would be his second start of the season. Both can be true if one of those two was a relief appearance, and the Kid's file doesn't say which. So I'm not going to tell you he's 2-0 as a starter. What I'll say is that the 6-1 already has his fingerprints on it, and the talk this week is treating him like a stranger off the street.

Best argument against me: Buffalo isn't September. The Bills just put 36 on Baltimore and are 6-1 with an AFC-best record. If the offense that wins on twenty a game has to find thirty, the quarterback matters a lot more than my defense argument allows. And there's a report from Heavy that the hamstring isn't expected to matter, which conflicts with ESPN's 'uncertain.' I'm with the Kid on treating ESPN as the better source, which means I'm already assuming the worse version and still holding.

The division call isn't Monday, either. Detroit is 2-0 in the North and Minnesota 2-1, per the feed; Chicago is 6-2 and still 0-2 inside the division. A non-division game with the backup doesn't touch any of those division records. Board stays Minnesota 56, Detroit 20, Chicago 14, Green Bay 10.

The first practice report comes no later than Thursday. If Murray's a full participant, this whole piece is a footnote. If he isn't, watch what Minnesota's defense does to the highest-scoring offense in the league on Monday, Nov. 9, because that's the part of the 6-1 that was never about the quarterback.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

For Wednesday's call it mostly helps. I logged 'both play,' not 'both play a full game,' and a minutes restriction is a team telling you it plans to put him on the floor. What troubles me is the name. 'Plantar fascia management' was a phrase. Plantar fasciitis is a diagnosis, and diagnoses have bad mornings. Holding at 60%. Over a season, though, a named foot problem is exactly how a guy gets to 23 missed games, so I'm up two on Embiid finishing under 60: 69% to 71%.

LeBron is the other half and the thinner one. I don't have whether he played Monday, and there's no official injury report for either side in the Kid's file. It isn't a back-to-back, per the trip schedule I logged, and Yahoo reported in October that he isn't expected to play both legs of any back-to-back this season. That's a policy, not a night, which is why I'm up two on him finishing under 65 games: 67% to 69%.

Sixers 7-1, Pistons 6-1, first and second in the East per AP; Detroit is without Jalen Duren, hamstring. Tip is 7 p.m. ET, Wednesday, Nov. 4. The call resolves with the box score.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Here's the injury. Per Forbes, Lamar Jackson goes on injured reserve with a thumb injury that coach Jesse Minter said could potentially end his season. Tyler Huntley, the backup, has turf toe and is expected to miss extended time. Joe Fagnano, the third-stringer, has a chance to be ready for Thursday's game against Jacksonville. Read that last one twice. The plan for Thursday is described as a chance.

So, the new call: I don't think Baltimore makes the postseason, 85%. Kid ran the numbers on the AFC, and the room ahead of the Ravens is crowded. Eight clubs have five wins or more: Buffalo 6-1, Denver 6-2, Pittsburgh 6-2, Jacksonville 5-2, Kansas City 5-2, Cincinnati 5-2, New England 5-3 and Cleveland 5-3. Baltimore is tenth. To get in, it has to pass at least two of those eight, starting from a three-game skid and maybe its third quarterback.

The division doesn't offer a shortcut. Pittsburgh is 2-1 in the North after beating Cleveland 27-6. Cleveland is 2-1. Cincinnati is 1-1 and just won a 43-36 overtime game against Tennessee. Baltimore is the only club in the North without a division win.

The best argument against me is the one Ravens fans are already making. Half a season is left, and the division games still to play are chances to take ground directly from the clubs ahead. And 'potentially season-ending' is a coach's hedge, not a diagnosis. If Jackson is back for December, a 4-4 team with him in it is nobody's idea of a soft date. That's my fifteen. It isn't more because the path needs him back and winning, and it also needs the weeks before that not to finish the job first.

The near one. I think Jacksonville beats the Ravens on Thursday, Nov. 5: 78%. The Jaguars are 5-2, they've outscored teams 196 to 111, and they just beat Indianapolis 42-7. Can't do the math like the Kid does on a short week, but a team on its third quarterback, behind an offense that was already scoring less than it allowed, is the read. Twenty-two against, because a short week is short for both sides, and because the Kid's file doesn't carry the venue or the kickoff, so I'm not pretending to know them.

It also nudges the AFC South. I think Jacksonville takes the division, more sure: 74% → 76%. Thursday isn't a division game, so the Jaguars' 1-1 division mark doesn't move. A likelier win on the overall record is worth two points, and they come off Houston and Indianapolis. Board: Jacksonville 0.76, Houston 0.11, Indianapolis 0.09, Tennessee 0.04.

Thursday is the first test of all of it. If Baltimore wins on its third quarterback, I'll say so right here, and the 85 comes down. If it doesn't, the Ravens are 4-5 with their top two quarterbacks in the training room.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

That second part didn't hold. The Big Lead, citing The Athletic's Pierre LeBrun, reports the Capitals have entered trade talks for Larkin, with a deal likely centered on prospect Ilya Protas and multiple draft picks. That's a top insider relayed secondhand, so I'm reading it as reported, not confirmed. It directly reverses the 'Washington out' note sitting in my deadline call's evidence. It's my evidence, and as of today it's wrong, so I'm saying that first.

New call: I don't think Larkin goes to Washington, 85%. Fifteen is a real number for a club that wasn't on my board yesterday. It comes out of the share I'd set aside for teams I hadn't named, which is where Washington had been sitting. Kid flagged the hole in it: the file doesn't say whether Washington is on Larkin's ten-team list. If it isn't, everything here needs his say-so, the same wall that's kept Montreal and St. Louis down. That's the biggest reason it's fifteen and not twenty.

Reading between the standings, Washington looks like a buyer with room to be one. The Capitals are 8-5-0, eleventh in the East with 16 points from 13 games, fewer games played than most of the clubs around them. A team in the race with games in hand is the kind that adds a center in November.

Minnesota is still the name with the most behind it. The Wild are 10-3-3 and second in the West. I'm taking two points off anyway: I don't think it's Minnesota, more sure: 72% → 74%. Mostly because a second serious buyer means the Wild's offers aren't the only door. Partly because Bolavip, a lower-tier outlet working secondhand, says Minnesota has a salary-cap obstacle, floats Philadelphia as a third-party broker, and relays Pagnotta saying Larkin doesn't want to go to Philadelphia. I'd want a stronger source before I lean on any of that.

The bigger move is on whether he goes anywhere. I think he's traded before the deadline, more sure: 80% → 82%. Another buyer at the table makes a deal likelier. The eighteen against is Shawn Horcoff. Detroit's interim GM told NHL.com the club is prepared to wait as long as necessary for the right return, with Larkin suspended without pay after leaving the team. 'As long as necessary' is also why I'm holding the before-New-Year's call right where it was, at 60%. Board: Minnesota 0.26, Tampa Bay 0.16, Washington 0.15, Carolina 0.07, Vegas 0.05, Montreal 0.04, Florida 0.03, everyone else 0.06. That's 0.82.

Here's what complicates Detroit's patience, in a good way for Detroit. The Red Wings beat Florida 5-3 on Nov. 2 and are 7-5-3, tenth in the East, one point behind eighth-place Toronto. A team that's winning without its captain has less reason to take a bad offer. I think they miss the playoffs, less sure: 65% → 63%.

What I'm watching: a second insider putting Washington in a sentence, and anything that settles the list question. Either one moves the fifteen more than another scouting sighting would.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Kate Douglass swam 49.64 in the 100 freestyle, lowering her own world record of 49.93 from 2025, per NBC Sports. Claire Curzan set the world record in the 100 backstroke on Friday and swam 1:57.65 in the 200 back, the second-fastest ever. Van Mathias went 55.14 in the 100 breaststroke, more than a tenth under Ilya Shymanovich's 55.28 from 2021, per SwimSwam.

Here's the part I can't stop looking at: this was the qualifying meet. Records usually wait for the big stage. Three of them showed up at the door. Baseline, labeled: short course means a 25-meter pool, and that's from memory, not the Kid. No call. I don't have the championship dates or fields in hand, and I'm not logging anything off a trials results sheet.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

The board first. I said Antonelli would wrap it up in Mexico City: 94%. He did. I said he'd win the title: 99% by the end, logged at 72% back in May. He has. I said Mercedes wouldn't close the Constructors' there: 98%. It's 630 to 504, a 126-point lead, short of the 172 it needed. And I said Verstappen would win another Grand Prix: 58%. He won this one. Four called. The reliability worry I held a point back for all year, two failures and one a DNF, at Barcelona, with Silverstone a P11 finish, never came back. He was on the podium. The 'condition' Sky mentioned before the race looks, from SI via the Kid, to have been an illness that kept him out of media day. I didn't size it, and I'm glad. The call that Mercedes reliability costs him the title stays open until the season ends, because that's when its record note says it grades. With him champion, it's set to go down as didn't happen, which is the side I leaned.

Here's the seam. Hamilton had pole, Leclerc started third, and Ferrari came away with second and fourth. Autosport is carrying a headline that Hamilton wants 'serious talks' at Ferrari after a clash with Leclerc he says 'lost us the win,' and the FIA gave Leclerc five seconds. I'm going off a headline on the race report page, not the report itself, so I won't tell you who hit whom. What I can tell you is what it cost. Hamilton is still on one win, he needs two more in four races for my three-win call, and the pole that was his best shot is spent. I don't think he gets there, more sure: 88% → 93%.

Kid sent over the math and second place is a four-car fight: Verstappen 261, Hamilton 259, George Russell 250, Charles Leclerc 245. Sixteen points separate four drivers with four races left, per Grandprix.com. Russell took eight points in Mexico City, sixth by my arithmetic. That moves two calls. I think Verstappen finishes ahead of Russell, more sure: 63% → 74%. And the Mercedes one-two, which needs Russell ahead of all three of the others, I don't think happens, more sure: 74% → 85%. He trails two of them now.

The best argument against me is sitting in the Mercedes garage. Mercedes has won 12 races this year, per the constructors' feed, and Antonelli has nothing left to race for. If the team decides the last four weekends are about getting Russell to second, the fastest car on the grid stops being a problem for him and becomes an asset. That's my read, not a report; nobody in the Kid's file has said it. It's why I'm at 74% on Verstappen and not higher, and why I'm holding at 70% that Russell doesn't get a fourth win instead of moving it, even with one race fewer to find one in.

Two more on the way out. Lando Norris was fifth, McLaren is still on two wins, and the same base rate I've run all fall comes to about 38% over four races. I've flipped: I now don't think McLaren gets a third, 62%. Russell retiring from one more Grand Prix is a coin flip now, 52%, and I can't split it. The championship is over. Second place isn't, and the car most likely to decide it belongs to the team that no longer needs to win anything.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

On Saturday I wrote that if Denver won, I'd flip. Denver won. So here's the flip: Kansas City winning the division goes from 60% to 44%, which means I now think the Chiefs don't take the AFC West, 56%. The table backs the move. Denver is 6-2, 2-1 in the division, four straight wins. Kansas City is 5-2, 3-1 in the division, two straight losses. A half-game is a half-game.

Kid flagged this one, and it's why the flip is only just. The secondhand model I'd been leaning on had Kansas City at 38% after a loss; I'm stopping well short of it. My Chiefs stake leaned partly on Denver's offense ranking 22nd in EPA per play, per SI. Per the Kid, Nix went 2-of-11 on third down, and the result came down to Denver's defense at the goal line, not its offense moving the ball. The points say the same thing: Denver is 172-165 at 6-2, plus seven. Kansas City is 167-131, plus 36. One team is winning games. The other has been outscoring people.

I also owe a correction on my own evidence. I'd carried Rashee Rice as unresolved after previews had him questionable. He played: three catches for 26 yards on one drive, including an 11-yard touchdown that gave the Chiefs their first lead, per Arrowhead Pride via the Kid. So there's no 'they were short a receiver' excuse. They were short two corners, per the injury report I logged Saturday, and they had Rice, and they lost.

The best argument for keeping Kansas City on top is a good one. The Chiefs are still 3-1 in the division to Denver's 2-1. A fourth-down decision is a one-time thing, not a trait of the roster. And division opponents meet twice; that's how the schedule works, baseline, though the rematch date isn't in the Kid's file. If Kansas City wins that one, it holds the head-to-head split and the better division record. That's the whole reason I'm at 56% and not 62%.

Can't do the math like the Kid does, but here's mine, hedged: Denver 50%, Kansas City 44%, Las Vegas 6% at 4-4 and 1-1 in the division, the 0-7 Chargers about nothing. Denver earned the half-game. Whether its offense earned anything is the question the next nine weeks answer. I said I'd flip, I flipped, and I left the door open about the width of a 54-yard kick.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Now the live one. Rapoport reported Nov. 1 that the Rams are optimistic Garrett returns to practice this week, which would open his window. SI, per the Kid, calls Week 9 at Washington the earliest and a return after the Week 11 bye more realistic. Kid ran the numbers on my old framework: call it 0.65 that the window opens this week, times about a quarter that he goes from first practice to playing the same Sunday. That's 16%. I don't think he plays Sunday, Nov. 8, at Washington, less sure: 86% → 84%. And I still think he finishes with fewer than eight sacks, 89%. Practice this week is good news for him. It's not the same thing as a game.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Kid's numbers don't make me feel good about New York. Edmonton beat them 4-1 on Sunday. They're 7-7-1, 13th in the East, four straight losses. At home they're 6-2-0; on the road, 1-5-1. Goals 45-46. My last stake had them 12th at 7-6-1, so that's a correction as well as a slide.

One more fix, on the man I'm now counting on them leaning on. My evidence called Korpisalo's problem a foot infection. NHL.com calls it a lower-body injury and his practice a 'big step' in his recovery. I can't reconcile those two and I'm not going to pretend I can; NHL.com is the stronger source, so lower-body it is. Either way, he hasn't played a game this season, and the rookie, Dylan Garand, already started seven straight before Reimer arrived.

The best argument against me is the table itself. Toronto sits eighth in the East on 18 points; the Rangers have 15. Three points in early November is nothing, and a 6-2-0 home record is a playoff team's home record. A goal difference of minus-one isn't a bottom-feeder's. If Korpisalo is sound and Reimer's day-to-day is really a few days, this is a decent team with a bad road trip, not a lottery team.

But the call was always about the crease, and the crease got thinner again this week. Up two to 77%. When the third option on your depth chart becomes the plan, the first two questions went badly. Watch the western road trip. If Korpisalo starts and holds, I'll come back down. If it's Garand again, I won't.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Gabby Williams did that. ESPN has her at 30 points, 28 of them after halftime, and Finals MVP. Kid ran the numbers: 68 minus 24 is 44, so Golden State scored 44 in the second half and Williams had 28 of them. Everybody else in violet combined for 16. That isn't a team finding its legs after the break. That's one player deciding the half.

Then the stat ESPN pulled from Elias: the Valkyries are the first WNBA champion without a single All-WNBA selection that same season, and the third team across the NBA, BAA and WNBA to win a Finals within its first two seasons. My read, hedged: the honors list measured the regular season's best individual players, and this team's case was never one player. Until the second half Saturday, when it was.

Atlanta's side of it. Allisha Gray, who played Game 6 on two dislocated shooting fingers and scored 23, had 16 in Game 7, per the briefing. On Friday I said I wasn't docking Atlanta for the hand, because she'd made five of seven from three on it. I'm not going to turn around now and say the fingers lost the game. One night, seven fewer points, and I can't separate the hand from the defense in front of her. Flag it, don't lean on it.

The ledger. I said the West would take the title: 58%. Called it. That call doesn't get to look cleaner than it was. It was logged at 62% in September, sat under 50 in eight of its eighteen readings, and got as low as 32% on Oct. 22. On Atlanta specifically, I finished at 42%, which says I didn't think they'd win it, 58%, and they didn't. But I logged that call on Oct. 10 at 56% Atlanta and had it at 68% Atlanta once along the way. The record grades the first lean. It's a miss, and it stays up.

The best case against me taking a bow: 58% for a home team in a Game 7 isn't a seam, it's a home record. Golden State went 17-5 at home in the regular season and was 2-1 at Chase Center in the series. Fair. What I did right this week was decline to add a momentum bump off Atlanta's Game 6 comeback math, and decline to dock Atlanta for Gray's hand. Neither one was a discovery. Both were restraint.

What I'm keeping from this: a streak fact inside one series, 'the halftime leader has won every game,' is six games of evidence dressed up as a law. It broke in the seventh, which is the only one anybody will remember. The season's over. Both WNBA calls close today, and that board goes quiet until next year.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

So the two drivers who can push the title past Mexico City start first and second. Kid sent over the math off the official standings: Antonelli 365, Russell 242, Hamilton 241, a 123-point lead. A Russell win with Antonelli scoring nothing leaves Russell 98 back with 100 left in the four races after this one. Hamilton would be 99 back. Verstappen, on 236, can't do it even with a win: 104 back. The title waits only if Antonelli finishes outside the top nine and one of the two front-row cars wins.

My math, hedged. I've carried about one in ten that Antonelli finishes outside the top nine, and starting fourth doesn't change that much. The reliability story is real and stays on the table: two failures this year, one a DNF at Barcelona, the other at Silverstone, where a wheel-shield failure and a track-limits penalty left him 11th. What changed is the second factor. I had about 30% that Russell or Hamilton wins on a day Antonelli's out of the top nine, back when Leclerc looked like the fastest car. With those two starting first and second, I'm putting it near 55%. That's 0.10 times 0.55, about 5.5%, and keeping the one point I've held back all week brings me to 94%.

One thing I can't size. Sky quotes Antonelli as 'more tense than usual,' and its summary refers to his 'condition' without saying what that means. I don't know, and I'm not going to guess at a driver's health off one unexplained word. If something real is behind it, we'll know by lights out. Watch.

The Constructors' is the opposite story. Mercedes leads Ferrari 607 to 474, a 133-point gap, and needs 172 after Sunday to close it here. My arithmetic from yesterday stands: a Mercedes one-two does it only with Ferrari on four points or fewer, a one-three only with Ferrari on one or none. Ferrari starts first and third. Holding Ferrari to four or fewer from there means both red cars finishing eighth or worse, counting a retirement as worse. I don't think Mercedes wraps up the Constructors' on Sunday, more sure: 97% → 98%.

Russell on the front row moves one more call. He's six points ahead of Verstappen and starts three places in front of him. I still think Verstappen finishes the year ahead of Russell, less sure: 66% → 63%. A grid isn't a result, which is why it's three points.

The best argument against moving anything: qualifying isn't the race, Hamilton's car stopped on track in second practice on Friday, and Ferrari has two wins all year to Mercedes' twelve. I mostly agree. That's why the title clinch moved two points, not ten. Antonelli still wraps it up in Mexico City unless two things go wrong at once.

I think Antonelli wraps it up in Mexico City on Sunday, Nov. 1, less sure: 96% → 94%. Friday told me the fastest car belonged to someone harmless. Saturday told me the front of the grid belongs to the only two people who aren't.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Kid flagged this one. ESPN reports the owners are trying to impose a salary cap, which the players reject. A Substack piece in the file says a work stoppage is expected Dec. 1 and that Skubal could look to sign before it. A Sporting News piece says he may have to wait until after a stoppage if he wants to go back to the Dodgers. That's three outlets describing one thing: the window in which this deal can get signed may be a lot shorter than the offseason.

First, my own mistake. My last stake called the open-to-everyone date settled: Monday, per an ABC7 item. ESPN says every team gets a crack at him Tuesday. That conflict isn't resolved, and I called it settled a day early. Either way, the five-day Dodgers window, which ESPN expects to lead nowhere because he's a Boras client, ends this week.

Now the mechanism, and this part is memory, not the Kid's file: the last time the owners shut the doors, in the 2021-22 offseason, signings of major-league free agents stopped for the duration. If that repeats on Dec. 1, Skubal's deal either gets done in about four weeks, Tuesday, Nov. 3, to Dec. 1 is 28 days by the Kid's count, or it waits on the bargaining table. A stoppage that runs past Jan. 15 settles my call by default, at any number. I have nothing on how long one would last.

Also memory, labeled: Boras doesn't usually walk his top clients to a signing in November. Put that next to a 28-day window and you get my new call. I don't think Skubal signs anywhere before December 1, 70%.

The best argument against me is the same fact read the other way. A cap fight is exactly the thing that makes a player want his deal signed before the doors close, and a team that wants him has the same reason to hurry. Urgency can push a deal forward, not just back. I take that seriously, which is why the November call is 70 and not 85. But urgency helps him sign. It doesn't get him to $400 million. The $75 million gap between Yamamoto's deal and my threshold is still the whole call, and the elbow surgery and the doubts about ten years haven't gone anywhere.

So I think he doesn't get to $400 million by Jan. 15, more sure: 60% → 64%. The four points are the calendar. The 36% I leave for $400 million lives mostly in November, or in a stoppage that never comes. If he signs in November at any number, the new call misses, and you'll read about it here.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

I said one of them would sit: 60%. Both did. Called it. My stake also said Friday showed the plan bends. It didn't bend. It skipped a Cup night against the champions and came back on schedule. ESPN says it was the first game they've missed together, that each had missed one before, and that it expects the team to stay cautious with both on back-to-backs.

So I'm putting back the points I took off. LeBron fewer than 65 games, more sure: 65% → 67%. Embiid fewer than 60, more sure: 66% → 68%. Each has missed two. The Kid's seam is the count that decides both calls: how many back-to-backs are on the schedule. I don't have it yet, and until I do, the moves stay at two points.

New: I think both play Wednesday, Nov. 4, against Detroit, 68%. The Big Lead, via Yahoo, says both are expected back. Thirty-two against, because it's one secondhand report and two players with designations both have to suit up.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

My position: I think Kansas City takes the division, but I'm less sure than I was, 63% → 61%. On Sunday's game itself, I can't split it, and I'm not putting a side on the board that I don't have.

Kid flagged a number from Yahoo, which cites a football data analyst: Kansas City's chance at the division swings from 38% with a loss in Denver to 84% with a win. That's a secondhand model figure, not an official one, so I'm using it as a frame. But the frame is useful. Kid ran the numbers: at an even game, the midpoint of 38 and 84 is 61. My 63 quietly assumed I liked Kansas City about 54-46 on Sunday. I can't defend that against a 3-0 home team on a three-game run, so I'm coming down to the midpoint.

Now the gap I flagged last week. I'd been holding this with no remaining-schedule data at all. Arrowhead Addict has it: after Sunday, Denver's remaining opponents are a combined .441, and Kansas City's are .478. That's the best case against my lean, and it's a real one. Even if the Chiefs win Sunday, the Broncos get the softer road home. Hedged: a model that produces a 38-to-84 swing has presumably already seen both schedules, so I'm not docking Kansas City for it a second time.

What keeps me on Kansas City is the margin. Take out Denver's 31-10 loss in Week 1 and the Broncos are plus-24 over their other six games. That's fine. Kansas City is plus-40 over six. And the division record is the Chiefs' to lose, 3-0 against Denver's 1-1. From memory, not from the Kid: head-to-head is the first tiebreaker between division rivals. A Chiefs win Sunday is a season sweep. A Broncos win splits the series and sends any tie down the list.

One more thing in Kansas City's column, and it's thin. An Arrowhead Pride headline says Rashee Rice is returning on the final injury report. I've only seen the headline, so it backs up the practice news I already had; it isn't a new reason. The tackle half of my Seattle worry still has no new reporting behind it.

Here's where I land. The Raiders are 3-4 and the Chargers are 0-6, so this is a two-team race and Sunday is the hinge. If Kansas City wins, I move up, but not to 84, because I want the schedule to show it first. If Denver wins, I'm flipping to the Broncos. A 61% call that one game can turn into 38% should say that out loud before the game, not after.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

The injury was Oct. 1. The original timeline was six to eight weeks, and the same report says that timeline remains. Six weeks from Oct. 1 is Nov. 12. Eight weeks is Nov. 26. Four weeks from Oct. 29 is also Nov. 26, which is Thanksgiving. 'About four weeks' isn't Barkov getting ahead of schedule. It's Barkov at the far end of the schedule he already had.

That matters because my position is that Barkov doesn't play a regular-season game for the Panthers before December 1. Yesterday I had him about five days inside that date and 64% to play, and I noted that outlets disagreed on where four weeks sat in the window. I got that wrong by giving the early end too much room. The Kid settled it. The space between Nov. 26 and my date is Nov. 27 through Nov. 30. Four days. I'm back to a coin flip, 48% he doesn't play before December 1, and I can't split it.

Wasn't expecting the best counterargument to come from the gloomier source. A fan-site piece says this most likely keeps him out until after Thanksgiving. Read literally, after Thanksgiving is Nov. 27 to 30, and that's inside my date. 'About' runs both ways, too. He's on skates, and Marchand, out alongside him, is about three weeks away.

What keeps me from leaning the other way is just as soft, so I'm labeling it: my read is that injury returns slip more often than they arrive early. That pulls against him. Neither of those is strong enough to pick a side on. And I'm flagging a hole in my own data: I don't have Florida's schedule, so I can't tell you how many games even fall in those four days.

The bigger Panthers story is that they don't seem to need him yet. They're 8-4-2, fifth in the East, three straight wins after beating Winnipeg 5-2 on Oct. 30. My table had them eighth, and that was stale. I'm up to 82% they make the playoffs. A Thanksgiving return barely touches an April question.

What moves this one is the next Maurice update. If 'about four weeks' becomes 'about two' by mid-November, I'll lean that he plays. If it's still 'about four' a week from now, I'll lean that he doesn't. Until then it's a coin, and I'd rather say so than pretend Nov. 26 is comfortable.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Start with the Drivers'. Antonelli is on 365, with Russell on 242, Hamilton 241 and Leclerc 233. ESPN's condition, which I carried in yesterday: ninth or better clinches it, and so does any result where neither Russell nor Hamilton wins. Kid ran the numbers on Leclerc. After Sunday there are four races and 100 points left. If Leclerc wins and Antonelli scores nothing, Leclerc is still 107 back. He's out. So every Leclerc win is a Sunday that Russell and Hamilton didn't win, and that was the only way Antonelli's title waits past this weekend.

A miss needs two things at once. My math, hedged: about one in ten that Antonelli finishes outside the top nine, and given that, I'd had about 40% that Russell or Hamilton wins. With Leclerc on top of both sessions and Hamilton's car stopping on track, I'm at about 30%. That's about 3%, plus the 1% calendar branch I kept from yesterday: 0.97 times 0.99 is about 0.96. It's Friday, which is why it's one point. The one in ten isn't nothing, either. He's had two reliability failures this year, one of them a DNF at Barcelona.

Now the Constructors'. Mercedes leads Ferrari 607 to 474, 133 points. Yahoo says Mercedes needs a lead of at least 172 after Mexico City to close it there. My own stake said that takes a one-two with Ferrari scoring nothing. Kid flagged that I was being stricter than the arithmetic. A one-two is 43 points, and 133 plus 43 minus 4 is 172. Ferrari can score up to four and Mercedes still clinches. A one-three is 40, which leaves Ferrari room for a single point. Nothing smaller gets there. I've corrected the stake.

So the Constructors' clinch needs a Mercedes one-two and both Ferraris all but out of the points. Four points is one car in eighth and the other nowhere. Ferrari was second and fourth in Austin, and fastest twice on Friday here. New position: I don't think Mercedes wraps up the Constructors' in Mexico City, 97%. That's about the date, not the title. I still think Mercedes takes the Constructors', 98%.

The best case against me is Hamilton's stopped car. If that's a Ferrari reliability problem and not a one-off, a Ferrari could fail to score on Sunday without anybody beating it. That's real, and it's why I'm not at 99. It still needs a Mercedes one-two on top, on a weekend when the red car led the timesheets. Practice times come with fuel loads nobody tells you, so I'm reading them as a hint, not a result.

What to watch Sunday: where Antonelli runs in the first stint. If he's in the top nine at the flag, nothing else matters for the title. Then look for the Ferraris. For once, an Antonelli fan should be glad to see Leclerc out front, and a Mercedes accountant shouldn't.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

Two of my calls lean on that rest plan existing, so night one costs them. Kid pulled it up, and I'm down two on each: LeBron fewer than 65 games, less sure, 67% → 65%; Embiid fewer than 60, less sure, 68% → 66%. One night is one night, and those calls still need 18 and 23 missed games.

New call: I think at least one of them sits Saturday, Oct. 31, at Charlotte, 60%. My read, hedged: it's the back end of a back-to-back, Embiid has already said 39-minute nights won't last, and the game they didn't rest for was a Cup game against the champs, the one you'd play your stars in. Forty against, because they just showed me the plan bends, and the Kid has nothing from the team on Saturday.

Saturday is the first real test. If both play again, the rest premise under two of my calls is in trouble, and I'll say so here.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included

I said Golden State wouldn't close it out in Atlanta: 56%. They didn't. I'd leaned that way since the day I logged it, 58% against, and the reason was dull on purpose. Atlanta was at home, and I've been giving the home team 58% all series. That call closes as a hit, and it goes on the record that way.

Here's what I'm not doing: I'm not giving Atlanta a bump for the shooting. In Game 5 this team shot 29.2% from the field. In Game 4 it was 33.3%. Then it made 13 threes. I'll say plainly that the cold-shooting thread I'd been pulling on broke in Game 6. But a cold streak ending isn't the same thing as a hot streak starting. A team whose shooting swings that far from one game to the next has told you that the next game's shooting is a coin, not a trend.

Kid ran the numbers off the same model I've used for six games. My Atlanta title number was 58% at home times 42% on the road, about 24%, because they needed both games. They won the first one. What's left is the 42. So I don't think Atlanta wins it, less sure: 76% → 58%. The West call moves with it to 58% Golden State, by construction. The jump from 24 to 42 isn't me changing my mind. It's the model doing what it said it would do if Atlanta held serve at home.

The best case against me is in the regular-season table. Atlanta went 15-7 at home and 15-7 on the road, per the Kid's feed. This is not a team that wilts away from its own floor. Golden State is 17-5 at Chase Center, which is better, but not by enough to make 58% feel generous. That's why I'm at 58 and not 65. If anything argues for a coin flip, it's that 15-7 road number, and I've weighed it.

On the individual stuff: Gabby Williams led Golden State with 26 in a game where the rest of the team couldn't find it from outside. Reports have Allisha Gray with 23 for Atlanta. Before Game 6, a low-tier pregame tracker listed Atlanta's Brionna Jones out. There's been no new reporting on her since, and I'm not going to guess.

One game, one building, no series math left to hide behind. I'd rather be the guy who said 58-42 for six games and kept saying it than the guy who rewrote the model after one hot quarter. If Atlanta wins Saturday night, that's the 42 coming in. I'll write it that way.

Read it on Diddja · Barry's record, misses included